Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a patch-based spatial authorship attribution framework for human-robot collaborative paintings, addressing the growing need for authorship documentation in AI-assisted creative production. The framework leverages commodity flatbed scanners and leave-one-painting-out cross-validation to classify image patches based on authorship. Results demonstrate 88.8% patch-level accuracy in distinguishing between a human artist and a robotic system, and conditional Shannon entropy analysis confirms the model's ability to detect stylistic overlap in hybrid regions.
Differentiating human and robot brushstrokes in collaborative paintings is now possible with nearly 90% accuracy using a simple patch-based model and flatbed scanner.
As agentic AI becomes increasingly involved in creative production, documenting authorship has become critical for artists, collectors, and legal contexts. We present a patch-based framework for spatial authorship attribution within human-robot collaborative painting practice, demonstrated through a forensic case study of one human artist and one robotic system across 15 abstract paintings. Using commodity flatbed scanners and leave-one-painting-out cross-validation, the approach achieves 88.8% patch-level accuracy (86.7% painting-level via majority vote), outperforming texture-based and pretrained-feature baselines (68.0%-84.7%). For collaborative artworks, where ground truth is inherently ambiguous, we use conditional Shannon entropy to quantify stylistic overlap; manually annotated hybrid regions exhibit 64% higher uncertainty than pure paintings (p=0.003), suggesting the model detects mixed authorship rather than classification failure. The trained model is specific to this human-robot pair but provides a methodological grounding for sample-efficient attribution in data-scarce human-AI creative workflows that, in the future, has the potential to extend authorship attribution to any human-robot collaborative painting.
