Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the implications of generative AI for K-12 education, specifically focusing on how computational thinking (CT) frameworks should evolve to incorporate AI and ML concepts. It argues for expanding CT to address AI's unique challenges and opportunities in education. The paper draws on prior experiences in integrating computing education, addressing algorithmic bias, and designing instructional programs to inform the development of AI-focused curricula.
Generative AI demands a reimagining of K-12 computational thinking curricula to encompass AI literacy and address algorithmic bias, building on a decade of computing education experience.
The introduction of generative artificial intelligence applications to the public has led to heated discussions about its potential impacts and risks for K-12 education. One particular challenge has been to decide what students should learn about AI, and how this relates to computational thinking, which has served as an umbrella for promoting and introducing computing education in schools. In this paper, we situate in which ways we should expand computational thinking to include artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies. Furthermore, we discuss how these efforts can be informed by lessons learned from the last decade in designing instructional programs, integrating computing with other subjects, and addressing issues of algorithmic bias and justice in teaching computing in schools.
Stanford HAI