Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper explores using reference-guided LLM evaluators as soft verifiers for LLM alignment in non-verifiable domains, where traditional Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is inapplicable. They design evaluation protocols to enhance LLM-based evaluators using reference outputs, demonstrating that this approach improves the accuracy of less capable LLM judges and further enhances stronger judges with high-quality references. The study shows that reference-guided self-improvement outperforms both direct SFT and self-improvement with reference-free judges, achieving performance comparable to training with a strong reward model (ArmoRM) on AlpacaEval and Arena-Hard benchmarks.
Reference-guided LLM evaluators can boost alignment in non-verifiable domains, enabling self-improvement to rival reward model training.
While Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has shown strong effectiveness in reasoning tasks, it cannot be directly applied to non-verifiable domains lacking ground-truth verifiers, such as LLM alignment. In this work, we investigate whether reference-guided LLM-evaluators can bridge this gap by serving as soft"verifiers". First, we design evaluation protocols that enhance LLM-based evaluators for LLM alignment using reference outputs. Through comprehensive experiments, we show that a reference-guided approach substantially improves the accuracy of less capable LLM-judges using references from frontier models; stronger LLM-judges can also be enhanced by high-quality (i.e., human-written) references. Building on these improved judges, we demonstrate the utility of high-quality references in alignment tuning, where LLMs guided with references are used as judges to self-improve. We show that reference-guided self-improvement yields clear gains over both direct SFT on reference outputs and self-improvement with reference-free judges, achieving performance comparable to training with ArmoRM, a strong finetuned reward model. Specifically, our method achieves 73.1% and 58.7% on AlpacaEval and Arena-Hard with Llama-3-8B-Instruct, and 70.0% and 74.1% with Qwen2.5-7B, corresponding to average absolute gains of +20.2 / +17.1 points over SFT distillation and +5.3 / +3.6 points over reference-free self-improvement on AlpacaEval / Arena-Hard. These results highlight the potential of using reference-guided LLM-evaluators to enable effective LLM post-training in non-verifiable domains.
AI2