Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces two retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipelines, VectorRAG and GraphRAG, to extract and reason about polymer knowledge from a corpus of over 1,000 polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) papers. VectorRAG uses dense semantic embeddings, while GraphRAG employs a canonicalized knowledge graph to preserve cross-study context and enable multi-hop reasoning. Results demonstrate that GraphRAG achieves higher precision and interpretability, while VectorRAG offers broader recall, and expert validation confirms the domain relevance and citation reliability of the generated responses, particularly from GraphRAG.
Unlock polymer insights buried in literature: a knowledge graph-backed RAG system delivers more precise and interpretable results than vector-based retrieval.
Polymer literature contains a large and growing body of experimental knowledge, yet much of it is buried in unstructured text and inconsistent terminology, making systematic retrieval and reasoning difficult. Existing tools typically extract narrow, study-specific facts in isolation, failing to preserve the cross-study context required to answer broader scientific questions. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) offers a promising way to overcome this limitation by combining large language models (LLMs) with external retrieval, but its effectiveness depends strongly on how domain knowledge is represented. In this work, we develop two retrieval pipelines: a dense semantic vector-based approach (VectorRAG) and a graph-based approach (GraphRAG). Using over 1,000 polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) papers, we construct context-preserving paragraph embeddings and a canonicalized structured knowledge graph supporting entity disambiguation and multi-hop reasoning. We evaluate these pipelines through standard retrieval metrics, comparisons with general state-of-the-art systems such as GPT and Gemini, and qualitative validation by a domain chemist. The results show that GraphRAG achieves higher precision and interpretability, while VectorRAG provides broader recall, highlighting complementary trade-offs. Expert validation further confirms that the tailored pipelines, particularly GraphRAG, produce well-grounded, citation-reliable responses with strong domain relevance. By grounding every statement in evidence, these systems enable researchers to navigate the literature, compare findings across studies, and uncover patterns that are difficult to extract manually. More broadly, this work establishes a practical framework for building materials science assistants using curated corpora and retrieval design, reducing reliance on proprietary models while enabling trustworthy literature analysis at scale.
