Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a cut-aware estimator execution pipeline, DistributedEstimator, for distributed training of quantum neural networks using circuit cutting. It quantifies the end-to-end impact of circuit cutting on iterative training pipelines by instrumenting estimator queries into partitioning, subexperiment generation, parallel execution, and classical reconstruction phases. The results show that circuit cutting introduces substantial overheads that grow with the number of cuts, with reconstruction dominating per-query time, but test accuracy and robustness are preserved, suggesting that scaling depends on optimizing reconstruction and scheduling.
Circuit cutting introduces substantial end-to-end overheads in quantum neural network training, with reconstruction dominating per-query time, but surprisingly, test accuracy and robustness can be preserved or even improved.
Circuit cutting decomposes a large quantum circuit into a collection of smaller subcircuits. The outputs of these subcircuits are then classically reconstructed to recover the original expectation values. While prior work characterises cutting overhead largely in terms of subcircuit counts and sampling complexity, its end-to-end impact on iterative, estimator-driven training pipelines remains insufficiently measured from a systems perspective. In this paper, we propose a cut-aware estimator execution pipeline that treats circuit cutting as a staged distributed workload and instruments each estimator query into partitioning, subexperiment generation, parallel execution, and classical reconstruction phases. Using logged runtime traces and learning outcomes on two binary classification workloads (Iris and MNIST), we quantify cutting overheads, scaling limits, and sensitivity to injected stragglers, and we evaluate whether accuracy and robustness are preserved under matched training budgets. Our measurements show that cutting introduces substantial end-to-end overheads that grow with the number of cuts, and that reconstruction constitutes a dominant fraction of per-query time, bounding achievable speed-up under increased parallelism. Despite these systems costs, test accuracy and robustness are preserved in the measured regimes, with configuration-dependent improvements observed in some cut settings. These results indicate that practical scaling of circuit cutting for learning workloads hinges on reducing and overlapping reconstruction and on scheduling policies that account for barrier-dominated critical paths.
