Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the stability of price window-based stablecoin designs, where constant mint and redeem prices constrain the stablecoin's market equilibrium. The authors demonstrate a fundamental tradeoff: achieving both short- and long-term stability is impossible without already-stable reserves, as the mechanism either risks reserve depletion via arbitrage or inherits the volatility of the backing asset. Their analysis reveals that widening the mint/redeem price gap to disincentivize arbitrage leads to price fluctuations proportional to the backing asset's volatility.
Price window stablecoins face a no-win trade-off: either bleed reserves to arbitrage or inherit the volatility of their backing asset.
In this paper, we explore the short- and long-term stability of backed stablecoins offering constant mint and redeem prices to all agents. We refer to such designs as price window-based, since the mint and redeem prices constrain the stablecoin's market equilibrium. We show that, without secondary stabilization mechanisms, price window designs cannot achieve both short- and long-term stability unless they are backed by already-stable reserves. In particular, the mechanism faces a tradeoff: either risk eventual reserve depletion through persistent arbitrage by a speculator, or widen the distance between mint and redeem prices enough to disincentivize arbitrage. In the latter case, however, the market price of the stablecoin inherits the volatility of its backing asset, with fluctuations that can be proportional to the backing asset's own volatility.
