Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the visual table attribution capabilities of multimodal large language models (mLLMs) by evaluating their ability to cite specific rows and columns supporting their answers across different table formats (Markdown, JSON, images). The study reveals a significant disparity between question answering accuracy and attribution accuracy, with attribution performance being near random for JSON inputs. The findings highlight the unreliability of current mLLMs in providing fine-grained attribution for structured data, particularly struggling with textual formats and column attribution.
Despite decent question answering, today's multimodal LLMs are shockingly bad at pinpointing the exact table cells that support their answers, especially in textual formats like JSON.
Multimodal Large Language Models (mLLMs) are often used to answer questions in structured data such as tables in Markdown, JSON, and images. While these models can often give correct answers, users also need to know where those answers come from. In this work, we study structured data attribution/citation, which is the ability of the models to point to the specific rows and columns that support an answer. We evaluate several mLLMs across different table formats and prompting strategies. Our results show a clear gap between question answering and evidence attribution. Although question answering accuracy remains moderate, attribution accuracy is much lower, near random for JSON inputs, across all models. We also find that models are more reliable at citing rows than columns, and struggle more with textual formats than images. Finally, we observe notable differences across model families. Overall, our findings show that current mLLMs are unreliable at providing fine-grained, trustworthy attribution for structured data, which limits their usage in applications requiring transparency and traceability.
