Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the structural causes of public transport issues in Ankara, Turkey, arguing that leapfrog urban expansion has created a mismatch between the city's fragmented periphery and its center-oriented bus network. The study uses a Connectivity-Based Weighted Distribution Model to estimate passenger volumes at a granular level, overcoming the lack of stop-level data. The analysis reveals persistent center-periphery asymmetries and spatially embedded accessibility inequalities within Ankara's transit system.
Ankara's transit woes aren't just about bus shortages, but a deep-seated mismatch between urban sprawl and a rigid, center-focused bus network that traps peripheral communities.
Ankara's public transport crisis is commonly framed as a shortage of buses or operational inefficiency. This study argues that the problem is fundamentally morphological and structural. The city's leapfrog urban expansion has produced fragmented peripheral clusters disconnected from a rigid, center-oriented bus network. As a result, demand remains intensely concentrated along the Kizilay-Ulus axis and western corridors, while peripheral districts experience either chronic under-service or enforced transfer dependency. The deficiency is therefore not merely quantitative but rooted in the misalignment between urban macroform and network architecture. The empirical analysis draws on a 173-day operational dataset derived from route-level passenger and trip reports published by EGO under the former "Transparent Ankara" initiative. To overcome the absence of stop-level geospatial data, a Connectivity-Based Weighted Distribution Model reallocates passenger volumes to 1 km x 1 km grid cells using network centrality. The findings reveal persistent center-periphery asymmetries, structural bottlenecks, and spatially embedded accessibility inequalities.
