Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel framework for analyzing software evolution by integrating semantic code embeddings with opinion dynamics theory. The approach encodes code snippets using code embedding models, reduces dimensionality with PCA, and models temporal evolution using the Expressed-Private Opinion (EPO) model to derive trust matrices and track opinion trajectories. Applied to three open-source GitHub repositories, the method reveals interpretable behavioral trends in developer interactions, offering insights into consensus formation, influence propagation, and project sustainability.
Quantifying developer influence and consensus formation in open-source projects is now possible by combining code embeddings with opinion dynamics.
Software repositories provide a detailed record of software evolution by capturing developer interactions through code-related activities such as pull requests and modifications. To better understand the underlying dynamics of codebase evolution, we introduce a novel approach that integrates semantic code embeddings with opinion dynamics theory, offering a quantitative framework to analyze collaborative development processes. Our approach begins by encoding code snippets into high-dimensional vector representations using state-of-the-art code embedding models, preserving both syntactic and semantic features. These embeddings are then processed using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction, with data normalized to ensure comparability. We model temporal evolution using the Expressed-Private Opinion (EPO) model to derive trust matrices and track opinion trajectories across development cycles. These opinion trajectories reflect the underlying dynamics of consensus formation, influence propagation, and evolving alignment (or divergence) within developer communities -- revealing implicit collaboration patterns and knowledge-sharing mechanisms that are otherwise difficult to observe. By bridging software engineering and computational social science, our method provides a principled way to quantify software evolution, offering new insights into developer influence, consensus formation, and project sustainability. We evaluate our approach on data from three prominent open-source GitHub repositories, demonstrating its ability to reveal interpretable behavioral trends and variations in developer interactions. The results highlight the utility of our framework in improving open-source project maintenance through data-driven analysis of collaboration dynamics.