Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper reviews the evolution of medical data sharing and machine learning applications in cardiology over the past 30 years, focusing on the role and history of the PhysioNet resource. It highlights the shift from physical data exchange to online databases and the recent surge in applying large machine learning models to physiological data. The paper identifies future directions for PhysioNet, addressing challenges related to AI's carbon footprint, Tiny-ML, reproducibility, and funding models, while advocating for open-access principles.
The unchecked fervor for pumping medical data into massive AI models risks exacerbating the AI carbon footprint and neglecting crucial issues like scientific repeatability.
Over the last 35 years, the sharing of medical data and models for research has evolved from sneakernet to the internet - from mailing magnetic tapes and compact discs of a handful of well-curated recordings, to the high-speed download of relatively comprehensive hospital databases. More recently, the fervor around the potential for modern machine learning and 'AI' to catapult us into the next industrial revolution has led to a seemingly insatiable desire to pump almost any source of data into large models. Although this has great potential, it also presents a whole set of new challenges. In this article I examine these trends over the last 30 years, drawing on examples from cardiology, one of the oldest data-intensive fields that is undergoing a renaissance via machine learning. From the early days of computerized cardiology, the Research Resource for Complex Physiologic Signals (PhysioNet) has been at the cutting edge of this field. This article, therefore, includes much of the Resource's history and the contributions drawn from 25 years of firsthand experience of co-developing elements of the Resource with its founders. I identify the most promising future directions for the PhysioNet Resource, and more generally, the growing issues and opportunities around dissemination and use of massive physiological databases, associated open access code, and public competitions, along with potential solutions to the key issues facing our field. Topics range from how we should approach foundation models in the context of the rapidly growing AI carbon footprint, to the potential of Tiny-ML and edge computing. I also cover issues around prizes and incentives, funding models, and scientific repeatability, as well as how we might address these issues by leveraging the PhysioNet Challenges, consistent with the philosophy of open-access from the early days of the PhysioNet Resource.
