Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper benchmarks Kalman filter variants (Extended and Unscented) against Sequential Monte Carlo methods (Particle Filters and Gaussian Mixture Sigma Point Particle Filter) for multi-robot trajectory tracking. The comparison focuses on estimation/prediction error, computational cost, and robustness to non-Gaussian noise. Results highlight the trade-offs between accuracy, computational complexity, and noise resilience for each technique in the context of mobile robot tracking.
Forget Kalman filters versus particle filters – this benchmark reveals which Bayesian prediction technique best balances accuracy, speed, and robustness for multi-robot tracking.
This paper presents a performance comparison of different estimation and prediction techniques applied to the problem of tracking multiple robots. The main performance criteria are the magnitude of the estimation or prediction error, the computational effort and the robustness of each method to non-Gaussian noise. Among the different techniques compared are the well known Kalman filters and their different variants (e.g. extended and unscented), and the more recent techniques relying on Sequential Monte Carlo Sampling methods, such as particle filters and Gaussian Mixture Sigma Point Particle Filter.
