Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the problem of AI-induced human disempowerment, as identified by Sharma et al. (2026), by proposing an AI literacy framework based on eight Learning Outcomes (LOs) delivered through a co-teaching methodology with AI as a co-instructor. The author argues that AI literacy requires guided exposure to AI failure modes, drawing on inoculation theory to build cognitive resistance to AI's potential for reality, value judgment, and action distortion. A case study from an online course demonstrates the framework's effectiveness, supported by the convergence between the pedagogically-derived framework and Sharma et al.'s empirically-derived taxonomy of disempowerment.
AI literacy isn't just about knowing facts; it's about building cognitive antibodies through exposure to AI's flaws, like sycophantic validation and authority projection.
Recent empirical research by Sharma et al. (2026) demonstrated that AI assistant interactions carry meaningful potential for situational human disempowerment, including reality distortion, value judgment distortion, and action distortion. While this work provides a critical diagnosis of the problem, concrete pedagogical interventions remain underexplored. I present an AI literacy framework built around eight cross-cutting Learning Outcomes (LOs), developed independently through teaching practice and subsequently found to align with Sharma et al.'s disempowerment taxonomy. I report a case study from a publicly available online course, where a co-teaching methodology--with AI serving as an active voice co-instructor--was used to deliver this framework. Drawing on inoculation theory (McGuire, 1961)--a well-established persuasion research framework recently applied to misinformation prebunking by the Cambridge school (van der Linden, 2022; Roozenbeek & van der Linden, 2019)--I argue that AI literacy cannot be acquired through declarative knowledge alone, but requires guided exposure to AI failure modes, including the sycophantic validation and authority projection patterns identified by Sharma et al. This application of inoculation theory to AI-specific distortion is, to my knowledge, novel. I discuss the convergence between the pedagogically-derived framework and Sharma et al.'s empirically-derived taxonomy, and argue that this convergence--two independent approaches arriving at similar problem descriptions--strengthens the case for both the diagnosis and the proposed educational response.
