Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the impact of simulated online community discussions on LLM-generated stand-up comedy. They created a multi-agent environment where LLMs generate jokes, receive feedback from simulated critics and audiences, and use this "social memory" to improve subsequent generations. Results show that conditioning LLMs on community discussion significantly improves joke quality, particularly in craft/clarity and social response, as evaluated by expert annotators.
LLMs write funnier jokes when conditioned on a simulated online community discussion, improving clarity and social appropriateness by a large margin.
Prior work has explored multi-turn interaction and feedback for LLM writing, but evaluations still largely center on prompts and localized feedback, leaving persistent public reception in online communities underexamined. We test whether broadcast community discussion improves stand-up comedy writing in a controlled multi-agent sandbox: in the discussion condition, critic and audience threads are recorded, filtered, stored as social memory, and later retrieved to condition subsequent generations, whereas the baseline omits discussion. Across 50 rounds (250 paired monologues) judged by five expert annotators using A/B preference and a 15-item rubric, discussion wins 75.6% of instances and improves Craft/Clarity (Δ = 0.440) and Social Response (Δ = 0.422), with occasional increases in aggressive humor.
