Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces Socially-Weighted Alignment (SWA), a game-theoretic framework for multi-agent LLM systems that balances individual alignment with collective stability by interpolating between an agent's private objective and an estimate of group welfare using a social weight. They theoretically demonstrate that SWA induces a critical social weight threshold above which agents no longer have an incentive to increase demand under overload in a shared-resource congestion game. Empirically, they validate the predicted threshold behavior using a multi-agent simulation, showing a phase transition from persistent congestion to stable operation.
Escape persistent LLM congestion by tuning a single social weight parameter, no parameter updates or multi-agent RL needed.
Deploying large language model (LLM) agents in shared environments introduces a fundamental tension between individual alignment and collective stability: locally rational decisions can impose negative externalities that degrade system-level performance. We propose Socially-Weighted Alignment (SWA), a game-theoretic framework that modifies inference-time decision making by interpolating between an agent's private objective and an estimate of group welfare via a social weight $λ\in[0,1]$. In a shared-resource congestion game with $n$ agents and congestion severity $β$, we show that SWA induces a critical threshold $λ^*=(n-β)/(n-1)$ above which agents no longer have marginal incentive to increase demand under overload, yielding a phase transition from persistent congestion to stable operation near capacity. We further provide an inference-time algorithmic instantiation of SWA that does not require parameter updates or multi-agent reinforcement learning, and use a multi-agent simulation to empirically validate the predicted threshold behavior.
