Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors created HLE-Verified, a cleaned and revised version of the Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) benchmark, to address concerns about noisy items biasing evaluations of large language models. They employed a two-stage validation-and-repair workflow involving domain expert review and model-based cross-checks to identify and correct errors in the original HLE dataset. Evaluating seven state-of-the-art language models on HLE-Verified showed an average accuracy gain of 7-10 percentage points, especially on previously erroneous items.
LLM benchmark accuracy jumps 10% when evaluated on a cleaned-up version of Humanity's Last Exam, highlighting the significant impact of dataset noise on performance metrics.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) has become a widely used benchmark for evaluating frontier large language models on challenging, multi-domain questions. However, community-led analyses have raised concerns that HLE contains a non-trivial number of noisy items, which can bias evaluation results and distort cross-model comparisons. To address this challenge, we introduce HLE-Verified, a verified and revised version of HLE with a transparent verification protocol and fine-grained error taxonomy. Our construction follows a two-stage validation-and-repair workflow resulting in a certified benchmark. In Stage I, each item undergoes binary validation of the problem and final answer through domain-expert review and model-based cross-checks, yielding 641 verified items. In Stage II, flawed but fixable items are revised under strict constraints preserving the original evaluation intent, through dual independent expert repairs, model-assisted auditing, and final adjudication, resulting in 1,170 revised-and-certified items. The remaining 689 items are released as a documented uncertain set with explicit uncertainty sources and expertise tags for future refinement. We evaluate seven state-of-the-art language models on HLE and HLE-Verified, observing an average absolute accuracy gain of 7--10 percentage points on HLE-Verified. The improvement is particularly pronounced on items where the original problem statement and/or reference answer is erroneous, with gains of 30--40 percentage points. Our analyses further reveal a strong association between model confidence and the presence of errors in the problem statement or reference answer, supporting the effectiveness of our revisions. Overall, HLE-Verified improves HLE-style evaluations by reducing annotation noise and enabling more faithful measurement of model capabilities. Data is available at: https://github.com/SKYLENAGE-AI/HLE-Verified
DAMO