Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This work reduces state-adversarial Markov decision processes to a strategically equivalent constrained zero-sum one-sided partially observable stochastic game and presents the first algorithmic route to computing $\epsilon$-approximations of initial-state dependent equilibria.
We study state-adversarial Markov decision processes (SA-MDP) as a game of observation-space attacks: at each step, an agent selects an action from a received observation while an adversary$\unicode{x2014}$who knows the true state the agent is in$\unicode{x2014}$chooses a perturbed observation within a state-dependent proximity set. While existing work focuses on Markovian policies, we develop a solution concept and computational approach for SA-MDPs under history dependence. This is motivated by results showing that history dependence can materially change equilibrium outcomes and can force both the agent and the adversary to adapt their strategies. First, we prove the non-existence of universal (agnostic of the initial state distribution) history-dependent equilibrium policies. In response to this finding, our main result presents the first algorithmic route to computing $\epsilon$-approximations of initial-state dependent equilibria. We do so by reducing SA-MDPs to a strategically equivalent constrained zero-sum one-sided partially observable stochastic game. We conclude by testing our algorithm on small analytically verifiable games and showing it scales to larger, more realistic benchmarks, including Atari Freeway rollouts with a 12-period ahead horizon.
