Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To resolve the semantic disconnect between discourse structure and referenced actors, the authors introduce DNE-ElecDeb鈥攁n entity-enriched political debate dataset鈥攁longside Joint Argument and Entity Tagging (JAET), a unified generative framework for extracting arguments and Debate Named Entities (DNER). Grounding abstract claims and premises in specific entity semantics is critical for machine comprehension of natural debates, which traditional modular pipelines fail to achieve due to error accumulation. Evaluating under BIO tagging, JAET outperforms the strongest sequential AM-DNER baselines by 41.9% relative typed F1 on debates and transfers to persuasive essays with a 52.7% boost, proving that argument roles and entity contexts mutually reinforce one another when modeled jointly.
Jointly generating inline argument and entity tags beats sequential extraction pipelines by over 40% relative F1, revealing that argumentative structure cannot be accurately decoupled from the specific real-world entities being debated.
Political debates are often analyzed through Argument Mining (AM) to investigate the key arguments that drive them. However, political arguments are rarely interpretable from argumentative spans alone, as claims and premises generally depend on the entities (e.g., people, events, locations, parties) they mention. Existing AM resources and methods typically annotate argumentative spans and roles, but do not provide a paired debate-entity layer for asking which Debate Named Entities (DNE), e.g., actors and events, are invoked within debates. In this work, we address these data and methodological gaps by (i) introducing DNE-ElecDeb, an entity-enriched version of the USElecDeb dataset that adds DNEs in both argumentative and non-argumentative spans and defines Debate Named Entity Recognition (DNER) as the task of detecting DNEs, and (ii) proposing Joint Argument and Entity Tagging (JAET), a generative framework that fine-tunes decoder-only LLMs to insert inline argument and entity tags into debate turns while preserving the original transcript. Under BIO-tagging evaluation, JAET improves relative F1 on the joint AM+DNER task by +27.3%, resp. +41.9%, under the untyped, resp. typed setting over the strongest sequential AM-DNER pipelines, demonstrating that such gains cannot be recovered by composing two independent modules. Notably, similar margins replicate on Persuasive Essays (+26.6%, resp. +52.7%), showing effective generalization to domains orthogonal to political debates. By unifying argumentative and entity-level representations within a single view, our contributions pave the way for richer political debates understanding.
