Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To isolate how interactive feedback shapes language acquisition, the authors pretrain child-scale GPT-2 models on the CHILDES corpus and fine-tune them via reinforcement learning against reward models simulating four distinct caregiver response types: communicative feedback, structural alignment, semantic contingency, and affective feedback. In free generation evaluations, structural alignment produces the strongest syntactic improvements, with communicative feedback offering moderate gains, whereas affective and semantically contingent responses fail to improve grammaticality. These findings provide a concrete computational mechanism showing that specific conversational feedback modes selectively scaffold grammar acquisition, while others likely target non-syntactic dimensions of language.
Structural alignment鈥攏ot affective warmth or semantic relevance鈥攊s the primary conversational feedback mechanism driving grammatical acquisition in sample-constrained language models.
Social interaction is central to children's language learning, but the effects of different forms of caregiver feedback are difficult to isolate in naturalistic data. We use child-like language models as controlled learners to test which forms of feedback support grammatical development. Small GPT-2-style models are pretrained on child-directed language from CHILDES, then fine-tuned with reinforcement learning using reward models trained to capture four feedback types: communicative feedback, structural alignment, semantic contingency, and affective feedback. Reward fine-tuning yields limited gains on minimal-pair evaluations, but clearer effects in free generation. Structural alignment produces the strongest improvements in grammaticality, providing a novel, plausible mechanistic account of how this feedback can support grammar learning. Communicative feedback yields more moderate gains. In contrast, semantic contingency and affective feedback do not improve grammaticality, although further analyses suggest that they may support other aspects of language learning beyond grammar. These results suggest that different forms of caregiver feedback make complementary contributions to language learning.
