Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
To uncover latent ghostwriters and staff contributors in political texts, the authors benchmark an inductive stylometric framework combining character 3-gram frequencies, UMAP dimensionality reduction, and Burrows' Delta across six diverse multilingual corpora. The approach successfully isolates individual analyst signatures in legal prose across English and Hungarian, accurately clusters social media output by author, and separates scripted from extemporaneous speech. However, the method fails on speechwriting teams subject to aggressive collaborative harmonization, establishing clear empirical boundary conditions for frequency-based text attribution under heavy editorial noise.
Institutional editing sets a hard ceiling on text forensics: simple character-level stylometry reliably unmasks ghostwriters in tweets and legal filings across languages, but breaks down completely when speechwriters homogenize their styles around a shared corporate persona.
Political texts are rarely authored by the nominal speaker alone. Tweets, speeches, reports, and official statements are drafted, edited, or harmonized by staff, yet political science has paid limited attention to the stylistic traces these hidden authors leave behind. This paper develops and stress-tests an inductive stylometric approach for recovering latent authorship structure in political communication, combining character 3-gram features with UMAP dimensionality reduction, and Burrows' Delta. We apply the approach to six corpora that vary in length (from tweets to long documents), in mode (written and oral), and in language (English and Hungarian). The approach recovers near-disjoint analyst fingerprints in formal legal prose in both languages, sorts a politician's tweets into validated subsets while uncovering additional insights, and distinguishes scripted from improvised speech. It fails, however, to resolve individual speechwriters within scripted corpora. Frequency-based stylometry is thus a powerful tool that, depending on authorial signal strength and institutional editing, can uncover authorship traces relevant to legislative studies, political communication, and policy research.
