Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper formalizes service health engineering, an end-to-end reliability framework that shifts operational focus from siloed component dashboards to user-journey completion via explicit service promises, watchdogs, and resiliency testing. This paradigm addresses the widespread failure of standard telemetry to catch silent degradations and stranded asynchronous workflows across complex distributed environments. By integrating a human-in-the-loop, AI-assisted reporting architecture, the authors establish a structured mechanism to synthesize telemetry and surface latent operational risks without ceding critical decision-making to autonomous agents.
Component-level metrics routinely report all-green health even while multi-step asynchronous user tasks quietly strand and fail.
Distributed systems support many critical business workflows, but service health is often judged through component dashboards rather than through end-to-end user outcomes. This article presents service health engineering as a practical reliability discipline that connects telemetry, workflow completion, dependency behavior, operational readiness, and recovery validation. Using a document approval workflow as a running example, it describes how service promises, service-level indicators and objectives, watchdogs, incident measures, resiliency testing, and weekly service-health reviews can reveal silent failures and stranded asynchronous work. It also presents a human-reviewed, AI-assisted reporting architecture for assembling service-health evidence without making AI an autonomous decision-maker. The approach brings established reliability practices together around whether user journeys complete as promised.
