Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The authors evaluate near-term verification mechanisms for U.S. AI chip export controls across three operational dimensions: end-location tracking, end-user legitimacy vetting, and end-use workload auditing. As physical and cloud-based compute governance becomes central to managing frontier AI proliferation, existing enforcement through the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) remains severely bottlenecked by regulatory and personnel constraints. The analysis concludes that viable, one-year deployment hinges on offloading monitoring onto accredited third-party auditors and exporter-led mechanisms that leverage existing on-chip and data-center telemetry rather than expanded government staffing.
Frontier AI hardware controls are functionally unpoliceable by government regulators alone, but a deployable framework of private-sector telemetry and third-party auditing can close critical verification gaps within a single year.
AI chip export controls can help the United States shape the development of frontier AI, but their effectiveness depends on reliable methods for verifying compliance. This paper examines near-term verification mechanisms (implementable in approximately one year) and groups them into three categories: end-location verification (whether controlled chips remain in authorized locations and/or jurisdictions), end-user verification (whether entities that acquire or access compute are legitimate), and end-use verification (whether computing power is used for prohibited purposes). We discuss how each mechanism can be implemented within the regulatory framework of the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), outlining implementation steps and identifying which actors can perform verification (BIS, exporters, or accredited third-party auditors). Given BIS's resource constraints, the most viable mechanisms rely on private-sector actors working alongside BIS, leverage existing technologies, and scale without requiring large increases in government staffing. These mechanisms could also help monitor future international agreements on AI.
