Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
Investigating the data requirements of on-policy distillation (OPD), this work evaluates LLM post-training at the extreme data-minimal limit across diverse task domains and model families. Remarkably, training on a single query recovers most of full-data OPD's gains by achieving 71.5% state coverage through student rollouts, while merely 16 semantically distinct queries reach 98.9% coverage and fully match full-dataset performance. This reveals that OPD is data-overfed but algorithm-starved, as the student's rate of absorbing teacher supervision decays at an identical pace regardless of prompt volume or task content.
On-policy distillation is massively data-overfed: a single training prompt recovers most full-dataset performance gains, while just 16 prompts saturate 98.9% of reachable state space to match full-data distillation.
On-policy distillation (OPD) combines student-generated rollouts with dense token-level supervision from a teacher. Existing work has mainly studied its algorithmic behavior, leaving the role of training data unclear. We examine this role at the data-minimal limit by training on a single query. One-shot OPD keeps improving for hundreds of steps and recovers most of full-data OPD's gain across task domains and model families. We explain this result through the states visited during training and the rate at which the student aligns with the teacher. We measure \emph{state coverage}, the fraction of the states full-data OPD visits that a query set's rollouts reach. A single query already reaches \(71.5\%\), most of it within the first 100 steps. Adding semantically distinct queries raises coverage and validation accuracy together, until 16 queries reach \(98.9\%\) and match full-data training. Yet alignment slows at a similar pace whether OPD trains on one query or the whole dataset, and even a fixed set of states takes hundreds of steps to absorb. OPD is therefore data-overfed but algorithm-starved. Its rollouts quickly expose broad supervision, while the student absorbs that supervision increasingly slowly. The state-coverage result extends to multi-teacher OPD, where 16 semantically diverse queries per domain match full-data MOPD. As a further stress test, content-light templates and off-domain WildChat queries also approach the real-query baseline. Task content and induced state coverage can therefore come apart. We hope these findings direct future work toward the step efficiency of OPD, and prompt a re-examination of the data and the mechanisms behind its recent successes in frontier post-training.
Tsinghua AI