Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CAPA (Collaborative Agent Predictive Architecture), a novel architecture designed to enhance the situational awareness of LLM agents in online meetings. By integrating a Perceiver to update meeting states, a Predictor to forecast conversation flow, and a Controller to decide when to speak, CAPA significantly reduces the silence rate of agents from 51.4% to just 2.5% in real meeting scenarios. The architecture's effectiveness is validated through a new evaluation protocol, demonstrating improved engagement and reduced hallucination rates while shifting failure modes from omission to selection.
CAPA enables LLMs to speak up in meetings, slashing silence rates from over half to just 2.5% while maintaining high accuracy in contributions.
In online meeting delegation, LLM agents fail to recognize when to speak. With no structured way to track stances, coverage, and floor, they miss the moments where they should contribute. Prompt-only delegates stay silent on 51.4% of the absent participant's talking opportunities on the AMI corpus. We present CAPA (Collaborative Agent Predictive Architecture), an architecture for online meeting delegation. A Perceiver updates the meeting state from each observed turn. A Predictor forecasts how the conversation will continue. A Controller decides whether to speak and which proposition to surface. A Generator phrases the chosen contribution in the participant's style. Two judges score the forecast and the action against the next observed turn. A Recalibrator updates the meeting state from those verdicts for future decisions. To evaluate online delegation, we introduce an episode-level protocol that scores whether, when, and what a delegate contributes around the participant's actual idea units. The protocol's schema-constrained LLM judges align with human annotations at Cohen's kappa = 0.71. On 137 AMI meetings, CAPA reduces the silence rate from 51.4% to 2.5%, doubles credited recovery (26.1 -->52.2), and keeps hallucination at 0.6%. The failure mode shifts from omission to selection, with each residual near-miss attributable to a specific module of the architecture. Mechanism ablations identify the meeting state as the lever that closes the recognition gap, where raw-context scaling alone does not.
