Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of adapting retail supply chain operations to evolving requirements by proposing a graph-constrained agentic framework that integrates domain agents and a central processor for optimal decision-making. By formulating requirement-driven adaptation as the joint selection of intervention routes and module-level changes, the authors demonstrate significant improvements in performance metrics. The framework was validated through real-world evaluations with a retail partner, achieving an increase in end-to-end success rates from 72-76% to 79-83% compared to traditional LLM reformulation methods.
Achieving up to 83% success in adapting retail supply chain operations shows that intelligent decision-making can significantly enhance operational efficiency.
Retail supply chain operations rely on coupled decision modules that must adapt as requirements evolve. LLMs offer a natural-language interface for this task, but existing methods primarily focus on individual optimization models. Extending them to heterogeneous decision pipelines is challenging because a requirement may admit multiple intervention paths with different downstream effects. We formulate requirement-driven adaptation as the joint selection of an intervention route and an admissible module-level change, and propose a graph-constrained agentic framework in which domain agents expose admissible reformulation interfaces and a central processor searches over bounded intervention paths. Candidates are validated and compared using downstream KPIs. In collaboration with a large retail partner, we evaluate 100 warehouse requirements elicited from practitioner interviews, with GPT, Qwen, and DeepSeek as base LLMs. Relative to direct LLM reformulation, our framework improves correctness and end-to-end success across all three models, raising end-to-end success from 72--76% to 79--83%.
