Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper develops an interdisciplinary framework that integrates formal algorithmic fairness metrics from Computer Science with the subjective perceptions of fairness shaped by social and cognitive factors. By synthesizing theoretical literature, conducting interdisciplinary workshops, and engaging with stakeholders, the authors highlight the divergence between technical fairness compliance and users' perceptions of fairness, which can undermine trust and acceptance of algorithmic systems. The key result emphasizes the necessity of embedding user-centered assessments into fairness evaluations to create systems that are not only technically fair but also perceived as just by affected stakeholders.
Users may perceive algorithmic systems as unjust even when they meet formal fairness criteria, risking trust and acceptance.
While fairness has become a central concern in research on algorithmic systems, the field remains predominantly shaped by Computer Science, resulting in a strong emphasis on formal fairness metrics and bias mitigation strategies. Nevertheless, this focus may obscure a fundamental challenge: fairness is not merely a technical property, but a subjective, context-sensitive human judgment shaped by cognitive heuristics, mental models, normative expectations, and sociotechnical factors. Crucially, users'perceptions of fairness may diverge substantially from the fairness criteria an algorithm formally satisfies; a system may meet predefined technical fairness requirements yet still be perceived as unjust by decision-affected stakeholders. In such cases, the system fails on a fundamental dimension: it will not be trusted, accepted, or considered legitimate. Taking a user-centered design perspective, this paper presents a work-in-progress conceptual framework that bridges Computer Science approaches to formal algorithmic fairness with normative and Social Science fairness approaches regarding perceived fairness, trust, and technology acceptance, embedding both within the sociotechnical conditions that shape human judgment. Through (1) theoretical literature synthesis, (2) interdisciplinary workshops, and (3) stakeholder interviews, the project aims to inform evaluation approaches that integrate computational fairness audits with user-centered assessments and guide the design of fairness-aware, human-centered algorithmic systems that support informed, well-calibrated fairness judgments by those affected.
