Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the limitations of federated learning in creative AI, arguing that while it preserves data privacy, it fails to empower creators in the governance of models derived from their contributions. By analyzing artist-governed trusts and cooperatives, the authors highlight that while contributors can consent to their data being used for training, they often lack agency over the resulting models. The study proposes four design principles aimed at establishing a more equitable governance framework that encompasses not just data but also the models and their federated use.
Federated learning may protect data privacy, but it often leaves creators powerless over the models that emerge from their contributions.
Federated learning is increasingly presented as a privacy-preserving advance: personal data remain on the device, and only model updates are shared. It borrows the vocabulary of the federated social web, yet inverts its logic, distributing computation while the resulting model stays with whoever convened the training. We argue that federation is not in itself a remedy for extractive AI, because outcomes depend on who governs the data and the model and who has agency over the practices that shape them. We describe three layers at which a creative community can hold its work: storage, circulation, and learning. Examining artist-governed trusts, cooperatives, and consent infrastructures, we show that creator governance is established at storage and circulation but stops at learning: contributors can consent to training, yet have little say over the resulting model or its federation. We map the research space this opens, pairing technical open problems with the human questions from which they unfold. We propose four design principles for a creative data commons that governs models and their federation, not only datasets: govern the model, not only the corpus; make the terms legible at the moment of contribution; design for refusal as a first-class state; and decide stewardship in the open and account for it.
