Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study analyzes the decision-making process of transitional autonomous vehicles (tAVs) during mandatory lane changes, utilizing data from 150 controlled experiments to assess whether the target gap is identifiable before the lateral movement initiates. By defining signal time (SigT) as a pre-lane-change reference point, the researchers apply Firth logistic regression to predict the tAV's merging behavior based on relative position and speed at SigT. The findings reveal that the traffic state at SigT significantly influences target-gap selection and that in-position and repositioning maneuvers follow distinct longitudinal trajectories, achieving an impressive average accuracy of 0.89 in predictions.
Traffic conditions at a pre-lane-change signal can predict a transitional autonomous vehicle's merging behavior with 89% accuracy.
This paper investigates how a production transitional autonomous vehicle (tAV) develops and executes mandatory lane-change decisions. Using 150 controlled mandatory lane changes from the NC-tALC experiments, the study examines whether the eventual target gap is observable before lateral movement begins and how the tAV progresses longitudinally from that pre-lane-change state to lane-change start. Signal time (SigT) is defined as an operational pre-lane-change-start reference point. A Firth logistic regression predicts whether the tAV eventually merges in front of or behind its nearest target-lane vehicle using relative position and relative speed at SigT. Longitudinal progression from SigT to lane-change start is then examined separately for in-position and repositioning cases. The traffic state at SigT contains substantial information about eventual target-gap choice and provides meaningful lead time before lateral movement begins. The proposed formulation predicts whether the tAV remains with its current gap or repositions to a neighboring gap by moving forward or dropping back, including cases with longitudinal overlap and ambiguous current-gap geometry. The model achieves an average five-fold cross-validated accuracy of 0.89. Results also provide preliminary evidence that in-position and repositioning cases follow different longitudinal pathways from SigT to lane-change start. These findings support a two-stage conjecture of the observable lane-change process: longitudinal preparation from SigT to lane-change start, followed by lateral maneuver execution. The formulation applies to in-position, repositioning, and longitudinally overlapping cases, and can support lane-change models that distinguish target-gap choice from lateral-onset timing while representing longitudinal preparation before lateral movement begins.
