Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SAGE (Selective Agent Guidance via Entropy), a framework that enables the learning of autonomous policies from imperfect Vision-Language Model (VLM) teachers by selectively querying them based on the learner's uncertainty. By distilling guidance from the VLM into a lightweight Reinforcement Learning (RL) policy, SAGE reduces the need for continuous VLM interaction and improves policy performance in sparse-reward tasks. The findings reveal that SAGE not only enhances learning efficiency but also allows the resulting policies to outperform their VLM teachers in certain environments, demonstrating the potential of using VLMs as adaptive guides rather than fixed policies.
Selective querying of VLMs can lead to autonomous policies that outperform their teachers while drastically reducing reliance on expensive model calls.
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) provide useful priors for interactive decision-making, but using them directly as policies is expensive and brittle: they must be queried at every step, do not improve from environment interaction, and can repeat systematic errors. We study how to learn a cheap autonomous policy from an online, expensive, and imperfect but informative VLM teacher. We propose SAGE (Selective Agent Guidance via Entropy), a framework that queries a VLM only when the learner is uncertain, executes the suggested action during training, and distills guidance into a lightweight Reinforcement Learning (RL) policy. Because VLM advice is not always reliable, SAGE can weight teacher-action distillation using environment-derived advantages rather than treating all suggestions as equally useful. Across sparse-reward visual reasoning and navigation tasks, SAGE learns policies that act without VLM guidance at evaluation time and improves over unguided RL in several environments, including settings where the learned policy exceeds its VLM teacher. The results show that selective guidance is most beneficial when the VLM can help the agent discover high-reward trajectories, and less useful when unguided exploration already succeeds or teacher actions do not lead to informative experience. SAGE also reduces VLM usage by prompting the teacher only on a fraction of training steps and requiring no VLM calls at deployment. Overall, our results suggest that VLMs don't need to be used as fixed policies to be useful; they can instead act as temporary, imperfect sources of guidance whose value is tested and internalized through interaction.
