Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the practices and challenges faced by civil society organizations (CSOs) in monitoring far-right activities online, highlighting their critical yet underappreciated role in countering antidemocratic dynamics. Through qualitative interviews with 15 practitioners from 12 Germany-based CSOs, the study reveals that monitoring efforts are predominantly manual due to a lack of tailored technological solutions, with enhanced search capabilities identified as a primary need. The findings also emphasize a cautious approach towards AI integration, as participants express concerns about trust and legal implications, ultimately leading to the introduction of a conceptual monitoring workflow and an open-source Telegram monitoring prototype to support diverse monitoring goals.
CSOs are trapped in a manual monitoring cycle, revealing a critical gap in technological support that could empower them against the far-right online.
As far-right actors increasingly exploit online platforms to disseminate ideology and mobilize supporters, civil society organizations (CSOs) play a vital yet underrecognized role in monitoring antidemocratic dynamics online. Unlike fact-checkers or content moderators, CSOs engage in long-term, contextualized analysis, often in resource-constrained settings and under precarious conditions. Despite their critical societal role, CSOs face significant barriers to adopting or co-developing technical solutions, including legal uncertainty, limited platform access, and chronic underfunding. Existing research and tool development efforts have largely overlooked these actors in favor of more institutionally embedded stakeholders. This paper addresses this gap through a qualitative study with 15 practitioners from 12 Germany-based CSOs engaged in online monitoring, positioning them as key yet overlooked stakeholders in the governance of digital spaces. We explore their current practices, challenges, and expectations regarding technological support. Our findings show that monitoring remains largely manual due to the lack of tailored tools, with enhanced search capabilities emerging as the most pressing technical need. While participants express openness to AI-supported features such as media processing and content discovery, many remain skeptical of automated classification, citing concerns around trust, legal usability, and professional credibility. Grounded in these findings, we introduce a conceptual monitoring workflow and describe its implementation in an open-source Telegram monitoring prototype designed to flexibly support diverse monitoring goals. We outline concrete design, policy, and research recommendatios, and introduce the manual labor trap as an empirically grounded concept that explains why monitoring CSOs tend to remain locked into labor-intensive, low-capacity arrangements.
