Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the impact of AI on scam operations, revealing that the use of AI has drastically altered the economics of scamming, leading to a significant increase in reported losses. By developing a model of scam profits, the author identifies three critical intervention levers鈥攔eporting rate, centralization of reporting, and report accuracy鈥攖hat can effectively reduce the profitability of scams. The findings indicate that even modest improvements in reporting rates can substantially decrease scam revenue, highlighting the potential for targeted interventions to disrupt AI-enhanced scams.
Even small increases in scam reporting can drastically cut profits in AI-driven scams, suggesting a powerful leverage point for intervention.
In 2025, scams were responsible for an estimated $442 billion in direct losses globally. In the United States, reported losses increased by nearly 400% between 2020 and 2025. Though AI in scamming is a relatively new phenomenon, its use significantly changes the economics of scams as well as the bottlenecks in scam operations. In this paper I investigate what interventions will remain effective under this new AI-driven scamming regime. I develop a simple model of scam profits to understand how different interventions asymptotically affect scam operations. I find that three levers--reporting rate, centralization of reporting, and report accuracy--multiply in their effect on expected victims per scam channel, reducing revenue per scam channel while increasing costs. Because effects multiply, interventions affecting all three could have a significant effect on the profitability of the scam business model. My analysis suggests that even modest reporting rates against high-value scam infrastructure could have significant impacts on scam profitability.
