Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the lack of a protocol-level timeout mechanism in AXI4-based mixed-criticality SoCs, which can lead to deadlocks and missed deadlines due to various faults. The authors introduce a configurable hardware IP that detects protocol violations and timing faults while restoring interconnect liveness through a cut-and-drain isolation mechanism, offering three designs with varying granularity: Phase-Level Tracking, Channel-Level Tracking, and ID-Level Tracking. The results show that Channel-Level Tracking reduces area by 36.7% compared to Phase-Level Tracking while maintaining detection performance, and ID-Level Tracking achieves an 89.2% area reduction, making it suitable for constrained environments despite a trade-off in detection latency.
Achieving an 89.2% area reduction in fault monitoring for mixed-criticality SoCs could revolutionize the design of safety-critical systems.
Mixed-criticality Systems-on-Chip (SoCs) with on-chip interconnects based on the AXI4 open standard protocol lack a protocol-level timeout mechanism, exposing systems to deadlocks and missed real-time deadlines when subordinate devices or managers fail or stall due to hardware faults, radiation-induced upsets, or software errors. This work presents a configurable hardware intellectual property (IP), non-intrusive in fault-free operation, that detects AXI4 protocol violations and timing faults at runtime and restores interconnect liveness through a cut-and- drain isolation mechanism. To address the fundamental trade-off between monitoring granularity and area cost, we introduce three designs at decreasing monitoring granularity: Phase-Level Track-ing (PLT), which provides cycle-accurate fault localization across individual protocol phases; Channel-Level Tracking (CLT), which coalesces per-phase monitors into channel-level supervision; and ID-Level Tracking (ILT), which achieves sub-linear area scaling by monitoring only per-ID transaction boundaries. Synthesized in GlobalFoundries 12 nm technology, CLT reduces area by 36.7% relative to PLT while preserving worst-case detection bounds at a minimal detection latency overhead, whereas ILT achieves an 89.2% area reduction suitable for tightly constrained deployments at the cost of a 3.7x higher median detection latency with coarser fault localization. Fault injection campaigns on a RISC-V SoC across 1.2 million scenarios confirm that no fault manifesting as an AXI4 protocol or liveness violation escaped detection, with observed detection latencies consistently bounded by theoretical worst-case predictions.
ETH