Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This vision paper critiques the notion that generative AI will democratize software development by equating broader access to code generation with true control over software artifacts. It argues that while AI can increase access for non-experts, the actual control over code鈥攅ncompassing inspection, evaluation, and governance鈥攚ill likely become concentrated among those with existing expertise and infrastructure. The authors emphasize that the role of software engineering is evolving, necessitating a focus on intent specification and governance of AI-generated code to ensure accountability and adaptability in the software engineering community.
Access to code generation via AI may rise, but control over software development is likely to become more exclusive, favoring those with deep expertise.
Claims that generative AI will soon write all of the code have led to predictions that programming is nearing its end. In this vision paper, we argue against this assumption that broader access to code generation necessarily democratizes software development, i.e., everyone can code but we have to distinguish between access and control: by access, we mean the ability of more people, including non-experts and less-experienced developers, to generate code-like artifacts with AI; by control, we mean the capacity to inspect, evaluate, integrate, maintain, and govern those artifacts as dependable software. While AI may broaden access to code production, control may become more concentrated among those who own or understand the code, software practices, infrastructure, evaluation practices, and deployment pipelines. Grounded in an expert panel, our vision paper argues that AI does not eliminate software engineering expertise but shifts where that expertise becomes most critical. The locus of software engineering expertise is shifting toward intent specification: orchestrating and governing AI behavior, evaluating software behavior, and integrating software systems. We conclude this paper by identifying research opportunities for education, tools, and policy that can help the software engineering community respond to the AI era with greater agency, accountability, and adaptability.
