Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the instability of standard critic-based training in reinforcement learning for large language models and introduces Best-Practice Critic Optimization (BPCO) to stabilize and enhance critic training. By integrating various techniques such as DPPO, bounded value predictions, and length-adaptive generalized advantage estimation, BPCO allows for effective token-level advantage estimation from a single response while conditioning on hidden reward-defining information. Experimental results demonstrate that BPCO consistently outperforms a strong critic-based baseline and matches or exceeds group-based methods across a range of mathematical reasoning tasks with models of varying sizes.
A carefully designed critic can provide a stable and efficient alternative to traditional group-relative advantage estimation in reinforcement learning for language models.
Group-based reinforcement learning methods such as GRPO for large language models avoid training a critic by sampling multiple responses for each prompt. A reliable critic could instead estimate token-level advantages from one response, but standard critic-based training recipes are often unstable. We study this instability and develop \textbf{Best-Practice Critic Optimization (BPCO)}, a recipe that combines DPPO, value predictions bounded to the reward range, Monte Carlo value targets, unnormalized policy advantages, and length-adaptive generalized advantage estimation. Because the critic is used only during training, BPCO can also condition it on reward-defining information, such as a reference answer or grading rubric, that is hidden from the policy. Controlled experiments isolate the effect of each design choice. Across mathematical reasoning tasks with models ranging from 1.5B parameters to 30B-A3B mixtures of experts, BPCO improves a strong critic-based baseline consistently, and matches or exceeds a group-based baseline while sampling one response per prompt. The same recipe also improves learning with rubric-based rewards. These results show that a carefully designed critic provides a reliable alternative to group-relative advantage estimation. Code is available at https://github.com/QPHutu/golden_critic
