Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates a dual gatekeeping approach in AI video content creation, integrating educator input and automated metrics to enhance pedagogical quality. By allowing educators to iteratively refine AI-generated scripts and employing automated checks for instructional coherence, the study demonstrates that principled resistance can elevate the overall quality of educational videos. Evaluation with 23 educators across various topics reveals that both layers of gatekeeping independently enhance key instructional dimensions, highlighting the synergistic potential of thoughtful resistance in AI-assisted content generation.
Thoughtful resistance in AI content creation can significantly elevate educational quality, proving that educators and AI can be powerful allies rather than adversaries.
To prevent the adoption of aesthetically polished but pedagogically flawed AI content, we study a video authoring pipeline featuring two layers of structured refusal. The first layer empowers educators to iteratively reshape AI scripts based on multimedia learning theory, while the second employs automated metrics to flag violations in instructional coherence and narrative-visual synchronization. While neither layer is exhaustive, their synergy ensures that principled resistance--the act of deferring AI output until it meets rigorous standards--becomes a catalyst for higher quality. Evaluation combining a study with 23 educators across 3 topics and automated metrics across 7 topics drawn from established science and philosophy curricula shows that both layers independently improve the same instructional dimensions, suggesting that thoughtful resistance and generative AI are not opposites but partners.
