Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the traditional accuracy-based evaluation of LLMs in social simulations, highlighting its inadequacy due to the subjective nature of human behavior. It introduces the subjectivity coefficient to quantify the variability in human responses and proposes Subjectivity-Adaptive soft-Label Training (SALT) to create soft distributional labels from semantically similar inputs. Experiments on the newly constructed SUBJSIM benchmark show that SALT significantly improves model performance by better aligning with the inherent subjectivity of human behavior, demonstrating a more reliable approach to LLM training in social contexts.
Subjectivity-Adaptive soft-Label Training (SALT) transforms LLM training by embracing the inherent variability in human responses, leading to more robust social simulations.
LLM-based social simulation is a promising complement to traditional methods such as surveys and behavioral experiments. A core question is how to evaluate the fidelity of LLM-simulated human behavior and optimize LLMs toward it. Prevailing practice evaluates by accuracy, checking whether the model selects the single response observed from a human, and trains the LLM to reproduce this hard label. However, human behavior is inherently subjective: the same person in the same situation may reasonably act differently, so an observed response is only one draw from an underlying response distribution, rendering accuracy-based evaluation unreliable and hard-label training misleading. To address these problems, we first introduce the subjectivity coefficient, an entropy-based quantity distinguishing objective tasks such as coding from subjective ones such as social simulation, and use it to systematically analyze how accuracy-based evaluation and hard-label training fail as subjectivity grows. Based on the subjectivity coefficient, we propose Subjectivity-Adaptive soft-Label Training (SALT): it pools observed outputs from semantically nearby inputs into soft distributional labels, with an aggregation radius adapted to the estimated subjectivity of each input; in the near-objective limit the neighborhood shrinks, so SALT naturally falls back to standard single-label training. Moreover, since existing datasets record only single observed responses and cannot support distributional evaluation, we construct SUBJSIM, a benchmark of 19,300 contexts covering 193 annotators and 100 subjective questions. Since real-world data typically provide only a single observation per input, our experiments train models from single observed outputs while evaluating them against the full response distributions, verifying feasibility in realistic settings. Results on SUBJSIM demonstrate the advantages of our method.
