Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper provides a thorough survey of one-stage object detectors specifically tailored for autonomous driving, analyzing their evolution from early models like YOLOv1 to recent advancements such as YOLOv10. It critically evaluates various design choices, feature-fusion strategies, and performance metrics, highlighting the trade-offs between speed and accuracy in real-time applications. The findings underscore the persistent gap between benchmark performance and the reliability required for safe autonomous driving, pointing to significant challenges and future research opportunities in the field.
One-stage object detectors can achieve remarkable speed and efficiency, but a critical gap remains between their benchmark performance and real-world reliability in autonomous driving.
Autonomous vehicles depend on fast and reliable perception systems to detect surrounding vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, traffic signs, and other road objects in real time. This paper presents a comprehensive survey and analysis of one-stage object detectors for autonomous driving rather than an implementation of a new detection system. The survey reviews the evolution of major one-stage detectors, including YOLOv1, SSD, RetinaNet, EfficientDet, anchor-free detectors such as FCOS and CenterNet, and recent real-time models such as YOLOv10. It compares these architectures through their design choices, feature-fusion strategies, loss functions, deployment trade-offs, and reported benchmark performance. The paper also summarizes commonly used autonomous-driving datasets, evaluation metrics, open challenges, and future research directions. Overall, this survey highlights how one-stage detectors balance speed, accuracy, efficiency, and robustness, while also emphasizing the remaining gap between benchmark results and dependable real-world autonomous-driving performance.
