Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the utility of internal representation statistics as indicators of example-level difficulty for adaptive inference in multilingual natural language inference (NLI) tasks across 15 African languages. The authors find that common metrics, such as parameter count and representation statistics, do not reliably predict model performance or decision-making efficacy in this context, revealing significant discrepancies in language capabilities. Notably, the research concludes that under the tested conditions, adaptive routing does not outperform traditional inference methods, highlighting the limitations of current representation-based approaches for this application.
Despite the promise of adaptive inference, internal representation statistics fail to provide reliable difficulty signals for multilingual NLI across African languages.
We ask whether internal representation statistics can provide useful example-level difficulty signals for adaptive inference in multilingual African NLP, and find that they cannot in this setting. Studying natural language inference across 15 African languages with frozen off-the-shelf checkpoints, we report four results. First, AfriXNLI's English configuration shares 1,047 of its 1,050 examples verbatim with XNLI evaluation data, and one widely used NLI checkpoint scores 1.000 on that test split, consistent with XNLI test exposure. Because AfriXNLI is derived from XNLI, its English, French and Swahili configurations cannot serve as clean evaluations for XNLI-trained models. Second, parameter count does not reliably order capability across African languages: our larger checkpoint is better in seven languages and worse in eight, with no significant aggregate difference. Third, across three multilingual representation spaces, angular dispersion is consistently more language-determined than effective rank, so pooled correlations can inflate one and mask the other. Fourth, the association that survives language control depends on the target: effective rank predicts probability gain from escalation but not whether escalation changes the prediction, while cheap-model confidence shows the opposite pattern; the two targets correlate at only 0.655. Under the tested models, signals, and compute budgets, no evaluated signal makes adaptive routing preferable to always-expensive inference, although an oracle exceeds it by 11 accuracy points at 60% of the compute. Our central methodological finding is that a representation statistic can be statistically significant for one notion of computational benefit while being irrelevant to another, and therefore be a poor decision variable.
