Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SPARC, a robust few-shot calibration method designed for vision-based industrial anomaly detectors facing distribution shifts. By leveraging only a handful of verified-normal images, SPARC employs a per-cell subspace projection technique to effectively remove nuisance factors without requiring gradient updates or detector-specific tuning. The method significantly enhances calibration performance, achieving an improvement of +13.8 percentage points in pooled Image AUROC across various detectors under challenging conditions.
Achieving a +13.8 percentage point boost in anomaly detection accuracy with just 8 normal images challenges the limitations of traditional calibration methods in dynamic industrial environments.
Vision-based industrial anomaly detectors are calibrated on one distribution but may be deployed on another that differs in illumination, fixture placement, or sensor characteristics, sharply degrading an otherwise accurate detector. Adapting to the incoming lot is a natural response, but labeled anomalies are scarce. We therefore consider calibration using only a handful of verified-normal images available before scoring the rest of the lot. Existing fixes require backpropagation, detector-specific tuning, or choices about feature directions that few calibration samples cannot justify. We present SPARC, a few-shot calibration method that intercepts patch features between encoder and detector and removes a closed-form, spatially indexed estimate of deployment-time nuisance through per-cell subspace projection. It needs only $k \le 8$ verified-normal images and uses the algebraic saturation rank $r{=}k{-}1$ on the encoder's native patch grid. The correction requires no gradient or weight updates and works with memory-bank, density, prototype, and mutual detectors. On the shift-prone benchmarks, SPARC improves pooled Image AUROC and AU-PRO$_{0.3}$ for all seven detectors whose image scores depend on corrected patch features by $+13.8$ and $+3.5$ percentage points (pp), respectively; on benchmarks without engineered shift, the changes are small and mixed. Controls that give competing corrections the same calibration images attribute these gains to the per-cell subspace structure rather than the images alone. Further ablations support the saturation-rank choice and characterize sensitivity to backbone and calibration conditions.
