Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper benchmarks various least-squares tensor hypercontraction (THC) techniques for approximating the two-electron integral tensor in many-body electronic structure calculations. By systematically comparing the accuracy and efficiency of these methods across diverse molecular systems, the authors identify the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. The findings, along with reference implementations in the open-source library PyTHC, provide valuable resources for researchers aiming to optimize computational costs in electronic structure methods.
A systematic benchmark reveals the hidden trade-offs in tensor hypercontraction techniques, offering crucial insights for efficient electronic structure calculations.
Finding a low-rank approximation for the two-electron integral (ERI) tensor is a crucial step towards reducing the computational cost of many-body electronic structure methods. In recent years, a range of new tensor factorization techniques, like the so-called tensor-hypercontraction (THC) approach, have been developed to achieve this goal. Unfortunately, a systematic comparison of accuracy and efficiency of different THC construction algorithms is missing. In this work, we address this gap by benchmarking these techniques across a wide range of molecular systems. In addition to offering useful insights into the advantages and disadvantages of the different techniques, we provide reference implementations in the newly developed open-source library, PyTHC.
