Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces OGA, a new formal system derived from RGA that incorporates the $\omega$-grounded universal rule, allowing for the certification of decidedness in totality questions about computable functions. By closing the openness of RGA with this single rule, OGA achieves a provable separation from RGA, resulting in abundant decidedness certificates while maintaining a recursively enumerable provability structure. The system reclassifies the G\"odel sentence as a genuine fiction, demonstrating that adopting it as an axiom is consistent and can be independently certified without conflict.
OGA reveals that the G\"odel sentence can be embraced as a consistent fiction, fundamentally altering our understanding of provability and incompleteness in arithmetic systems.
Grounded arithmetic is a family of formal systems for reasoning about computation in which a statement may be asserted only when a terminating computation backs it; the logics are paracomplete - for a sentence whose backing computation never settles, neither the sentence nor its negation is derivable, so paradoxes like the Liar are harmless rather than explosive. The reflective member of the family, RGA, can quantify over its own computations, but cannot certify that its own unbounded searches have definite yes-or-no answers. This paper studies what happens when that openness is closed by exactly one rule - ATI, the $\omega$-grounded universal: if every numeric instance of a universal sentence is certified decided, the universal is certified decided. The resulting system, OGA, shares RGA's syntax and rules symbol-for-symbol otherwise, and every consequence is developed as a machine-checked theorem. Decidedness certificates become abundant - every totality question about a computable function is certified to have an answer, whether or not anyone can produce it - and this is exactly the provable separation between the two systems. OGA is complete for its own semantics; certified-but-unresolved sentences receive values built from the system's own open questions. Provability remains recursively enumerable, with a primitive-recursive certificate checker, while $\omega$-truth deliberately is not. Within that asymmetry, incompleteness takes a new form. The G\"odel sentence is classified, unconditionally, as a genuine fiction: neither provable nor refutable, yet valued, and carrying a computable pedigree recording exactly what adopting it as an axiom commits one to. The adoption is itself a theorem suite: extending OGA by any finite stock of true fictions is consistent, and independently certified adoptions can never collide.
