Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces GADR, a multi-agent workflow designed to extract architectural decisions from unstructured meeting transcriptions and generate Nygard-formatted Architecture Decision Records (ADRs). The method addresses the challenge of noisy, informal discussions where architectural choices are often implicit and fragmented, demonstrating superior performance in clarity and structural adherence compared to traditional zero-shot and few-shot prompting methods. A feasibility study involving real project transcripts and expert evaluations indicates that GADR effectively captures expert-identified decisions, highlighting its potential to enhance the documentation process in architectural decision-making.
GADR reveals that even in chaotic meetings, a structured approach can yield clear and actionable architectural decisions, outperforming conventional methods.
Existing LLM-based approaches to Architecture Decision Record (ADR) generation share a critical and largely unexamined assumption: that input is already reasonably structured. In practice, architectural decisions emerge from informal, noisy meetings where choices are implicit, fragmented, and entangled with off-topic dialogue, precisely the conditions under which single-pass prompting degrades. This paper presents GADR, a multi-agent, self-correcting workflow that extracts architectural decisions from raw meeting transcriptions and generates Nygard-formatted ADR drafts. A feasibility study comprising five real project meeting transcripts, expert review by four senior architects, and evaluation by fifteen students provides initial evidence that the agentic workflow captures most expert-identified decisions and produces drafts participants found clear and useful, outperforming zero-shot and few-shot baselines in stability and structural adherence. The study also addresses the underexplored trade-off of RAG-based enrichment improving ADR depth while simultaneously risking transcript-unfaithful content, raising open questions about traceability in automated architectural documentation that we believe is worth the community's attention.
