Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces an explainable AI-powered framework for the automated assessment of surgical skills in cataract surgery, addressing the critical shortage of trained surgeons and the limitations of traditional training methods. Utilizing the world's largest dataset of 2,000 cataract surgery videos, the framework employs advanced computer vision and signal-processing techniques to derive objective performance indicators that correlate strongly with expert evaluations, achieving up to 87% accuracy. The explainability of the framework's outputs enhances its utility, making it a valuable tool for surgical education and assessment.
Automated skill assessment in cataract surgery can achieve 87% accuracy while providing explainable metrics that align closely with expert evaluations.
Persistent shortages in the surgical workforce and inherent limitations of traditional training methods highlight the necessity of automated, data-driven approaches in surgical education. This study addresses these challenges by introducing a novel, explainable AI-powered framework for automated skill assessment, specifically focusing on cataract surgery. We present the world's largest dataset of cataract surgery videos, comprising 2,000 recordings. Additionally, we propose an AI-powered analytical framework that employs advanced computer vision and signal-processing techniques to automatically evaluate surgical videos to derive objective, quantitative performance indicators that complement or potentially replace subjective scoring methods. A significant advantage of our framework over previous methods lies precisely in its explainability of outputs, elevating it beyond merely an opaque skill classification tool. Through experimental analysis of 83 cataract surgery videos, we demonstrate that the automatically computed metrics exhibit strong correlations with expert-based subjective evaluations, achieving up to 87% accuracy in surgical skill assessment. Each metric was individually examined, and expert surgeons provided subjective ratings using the newly introduced Capsulorhexis Skill Assessment System (CSAS). These subjective assessments were compared with ten objective motion-based metrics extracted through our framework. The results indicated a robust correlation between subjective ratings and automated indicators, underscoring the framework's capacity to accurately model surgical expertise.
