Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces Fair-ASR, a novel evaluation protocol for assessing black-box jailbreak attacks on LLMs that accounts for shared target-call budgets, addressing the limitations of existing methods that rely solely on attack success rates. By re-evaluating 11 representative attacks under this new framework, the authors reveal significant shifts in attack rankings based on target-call budgets and highlight the competitive performance of simple stochastic perturbations and hand-crafted templates. Additionally, they present ReCode, a budget-efficient attack strategy that achieves an impressive 85% attack success rate on GPT-5 with only 7.19 attacker calls per request, demonstrating a notable efficiency gain in resource utilization.
Attack rankings shift dramatically when evaluated under shared target-call budgets, revealing hidden efficiencies in traditional methods.
Reliable jailbreak evaluation is essential for assessing LLM safety, but most existing studies rely solely on attack success rate (ASR) without accounting for its dependence on attack budgets, resulting in unfair comparisons across methods. Existing compute-aware evaluations reduce heterogeneous resources into FLOPs, which is difficult to estimate for black-box models and fails to capture resource-specific constraints. To provide a comparable evaluation basis, we introduce Fair-ASR, an evaluation protocol for black-box jailbreak attacks under shared target-call budgets B, using target calls as a directly observable and method-agnostic comparison axis while tracking attacker calls separately for efficiency analysis. We re-evaluate 11 representative attacks under the Fair-ASR protocol and find that attack rankings change substantially across target-call budgets, simple stochastic perturbations and hand-crafted templates remain highly competitive under equal target access, and no evaluated LLM-driven method is efficient in both target and attacker calls. Motivated by this efficiency gap, we introduce ReCode, a compositional budget-efficient attack that combines desensitization rewriting with two effective low-cost primitives identified by Fair-ASR. Under a budget of 20 target calls, ReCode achieves 85% ASR on GPT-5 while requiring only 7.19 attacker calls per request on average, showing strong efficiency in both target and attacker calls.
