Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores global sensitivity analysis (GSA) by integrating physics-based models with experimental data through physics-informed machine learning techniques, specifically deep neural networks (DNN) and Gaussian processes (GP). The authors investigate two strategies for incorporating physics knowledge: modifying loss functions to enforce physics constraints and pre-training models with simulation data before updating them with experimental observations. Results show that DNN-based models yield tighter bounds on sensitivity estimates compared to GP models, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed fusion approach in engineering applications like additive manufacturing and lake temperature modeling.
DNNs can significantly enhance sensitivity estimates in engineering models by effectively integrating physics knowledge with experimental data.
When computational models (either physics-based or data-driven) are used for the sensitivity analysis of engineering systems, the sensitivity estimate is affected by the accuracy and uncertainty of the model. This paper considers global sensitivity analysis (GSA) for situations where both a physics-based model and experimental observations are available, and investigates physics-informed machine learning strategies to effectively combine the two sources of information in order to maximize the accuracy of the sensitivity estimate. Two representative machine learning (ML) techniques are considered, namely, deep neural networks (DNN) and Gaussian process (GP) modeling, and two strategies for incorporating physics knowledge within these techniques are investigated, namely: (i) incorporating loss functions in the ML models to enforce physics constraints, and (ii) pre-training and updating the ML model using simulation and experimental data respectively. Four different models are built for each type (DNN and GP), and the uncertainties in these models are included in the Sobol indices computation. The DNN-based models, with many degrees of freedom in terms of model parameters and training options, are found to result in smaller bounds on the sensitivity estimates when compared to the GP-based models. The proposed methods are illustrated for additive manufacturing and lake temperature modeling examples.
