Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The paper introduces GoalEvolve, a novel framework for evolving physical design algorithms that prioritizes the final quality of results (QoR) across multi-stage optimization flows. By converting unmet requirements into normalized target gaps and utilizing an LLM-based Teacher alongside parallel Student agents, GoalEvolve effectively identifies and addresses bottlenecks in the design process. The framework demonstrates significant improvements in post-route TNS and power metrics across various design scenarios, outperforming existing tools and methodologies.
GoalEvolve achieves a 30.67% improvement in post-route TNS while simultaneously reducing leakage and dynamic power, showcasing a transformative approach to physical design algorithm evolution.
Physical design algorithms operate within tightly coupled, multi-stage optimization flows, where stage-local gains may vanish or induce downstream degradation. Existing program-evolution frameworks often rely on stage-local objectives or undifferentiated multi-metric feedback, which neither guarantee better final results nor identify which unmet requirement should guide the next iteration. We present GoalEvolve, a goal-driven framework that makes physical design algorithm evolution accountable for the final quality of results (QoR) of the complete flow. Given a multi-objective QoR target region, GoalEvolve converts unmet requirements into normalized target gaps, identifies the dominant bottleneck, and uses stage-resolved checkpoint evidence to locate the responsible stage. An LLM-based Teacher then narrows the search to a relevant algorithmic decision and source region, while parallel Student agents implement and validate hypotheses through full-flow evaluation. Local effects, optimization debt, and downstream retention are retained as mechanism evidence for subsequent evolution. Across eight ASAP7 designs, GoalEvolve improves post-route TNS by 30.67% on average and reduces leakage and dynamic power by 21.18% and 9.42% versus default OpenROAD. Relative to commercial-tool goals, it closes 62.20% of the normalized power gap on power-dominant designs, surpasses the TNS goals on both timing-dominant designs, and closes 32.48% of the equal-weight timing-power gap on joint designs. Across all three designs evaluated against Codex goal mode under matched budgets, GoalEvolve further improves TNS by 26.46% while reducing leakage and dynamic power by 12.38% and 0.76%, respectively.
