Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces REFLEX, a framework that quantifies the stability of machine learning models used by dealers in over-the-counter corporate bond markets as they retrain on their own trading data. By replacing unobservable quantities with measurable dealer behaviors, REFLEX provides a retraining modulus that predicts whether repeated model updates will lead to market stability or instability. In simulations, REFLEX accurately forecasts stability outcomes, revealing that competing dealers can significantly amplify market instability, highlighting the importance of pre-deployment assessments for model retraining in financial contexts.
Competing dealers can increase market instability by over 3 times, revealing the critical need for a pre-deployment stability margin in machine learning models for trading.
In over-the-counter corporate bond markets, dealers compete for client trades by quoting bid and ask prices. Tighter quotes attract more business, but also informed customers more likely to trade ahead of adverse price moves, leaving the dealer holding the risk. As dealers increasingly use machine learning to set quotes, they retrain these models on the trades their own quotes attract, creating a feedback loop in which each model reshapes the market that generates its next training data. The question is therefore not only whether a quoting model performs well, but whether the market it creates stays stable as the model learns from it. Existing performative prediction theory gives a sharp stability condition, yet expresses it through abstract properties of the learning objective a trading desk cannot measure before deployment. We introduce REFLEX, a framework that replaces those unobservable quantities with three measurable features of dealer behavior: how strongly trading volume responds to tighter quotes, how sharply the dealer's objective bends around its optimum, and how quickly informed flow increases as spreads narrow. REFLEX combines these into a single retraining modulus, a pre-deployment stability margin estimated from a desk's own quote and execution history that predicts whether repeated retraining will converge or amplify itself. In simulation, predicted and measured stability agree within 8%, and competing dealers increase instability by 1.74x with two and 3.16x with three, as predicted. Where ordinary retraining becomes unstable at modulus 1.21, a structurally anchored correction converges as blind retraining collapses. Calibrated over 36 years of public market data, stability headroom falls roughly 4.4x for investment grade and 4.3x for high yield from calm to crisis regimes. Ultimately, REFLEX turns an abstract convergence theorem into a market-level safety margin.
