Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the synchronization gaps in software forks by analyzing 3,820 actively maintained GitHub fork families. It uncovers a synchronization paradox where, despite 90% of pull requests being merged, only 6.92% of fork commits are integrated, leading to significant delays and missed opportunities for improvements across repositories. The research highlights that most pull request rejections are not due to technical issues but rather to superseded contributions and maintainer policies, emphasizing the need for better synchronization strategies in fork-based development.
Despite high pull request acceptance rates, a staggering 93% of valuable commits in software forks remain unmerged, highlighting a critical gap in collaborative development.
Fork-based development enables parallel evolution of software, but unsynchronized contributions create persistent divergence: security patches, bug fixes, and quality improvements often fail to propagate across fork families, leaving downstream users exposed to known vulnerabilities or bugs and missing massive opportunities to improve the other repositories in the family. We present the first large-scale empirical study of fork synchronization, analyzing popular GitHub fork families with 3,820 actively maintained forks, and developed a monitoring platform to mine the valuable commits and promote their swift merging. Our findings reveal a synchronization paradox: while 90% of submitted pull requests are merged, only 6.92% of fork commits ever appear in PRs, leaving massive fork development permanently unsynchronized across the families. Synchronization delay is pervasive and structurally uneven where fork propagation accounts for 72.9% of end-to-end commit lifecycle delay. Contrary to common assumptions, PR rejection is rarely caused by technical incorrectness; instead, 65% of rejections stem from superseded contributions, process violations, or maintainer policy decisions.
Tsinghua AI