Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the prevailing focus on the autonomous capabilities of AI scientists by advocating for the study of AI agents as integral components of human-agent systems (HAS) in scientific teams. It highlights the risks of neglecting human-agent dynamics, such as reduced diversity in scientific inquiry, and presents empirical evidence demonstrating how AI agents and human scientists can enhance each other's capabilities. The authors call for a paradigm shift towards HAS frameworks to better understand and optimize the collaboration between humans and AI in scientific discovery.
Ignoring the social dynamics of human-agent collaboration in science could stifle innovation and diversity in research outcomes.
Large language model-based agents are increasingly deployed as collaborators in scientific discovery yet most current work focuses on the autonomous capabilities of "AI Scientists". We argue that this overlooks the social aspects of scientific teamwork, and that studying AI Scientists as human-agent systems (HAS)--where the unit of analysis is the human-agent pair--is both underexplored and undervalued. We establish these points through literature and empirical analysis, and highlight recent incidences and studies which show that deploying agents in science without accounting for human-agent dynamics introduces near-term risks, including reduced diversity of scientific inquiry. Through analysis of real-world case studies, we show that scientists and agents can augment each other's capabilities. We call for new research that adopts the HAS lens to develop mathematical frameworks for understanding and fostering human-AI synergy in scientific discovery.
