Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a lightweight framework for proactive collision avoidance in robotic manipulator teleoperation, addressing the challenges posed by sudden obstacles and network latency. By predicting potential collisions using time-to-collision (TTC) and adjusting the relative velocity vector through Rodrigues' rotation formula, the method effectively mitigates deadlock issues common in traditional artificial potential field approaches. Simulation and experimental results demonstrate a significant improvement in collision avoidance rates compared to baseline methods, highlighting the framework's practical applicability in dynamic environments.
Collision avoidance rates soar as a new framework predicts and mitigates risks in robotic teleoperation, even under latency constraints.
Recent advances in teleoperation have enabled robotic manipulators to perform dexterous, human-arm-like motions. However, human operators may fail to avoid suddenly appearing obstacles promptly and effectively, particularly under network latency or limited attention, thereby creating safety risks. To address this issue, we propose a lightweight and modular framework for proactive collision avoidance, operating directly at the end-effector velocity-command level. After preprocessing the point cloud, the framework first predicts potential collisions based on time-to-collision (TTC) with integrated overshoot protection, and subsequently rotates the relative-velocity vector using Rodrigues'rotation formula. The deflection changes only the direction of the relative velocity while preserving its magnitude, thereby mitigating the deadlock problem commonly encountered by conventional artificial potential field (APF) methods. The prediction module compensates for point-cloud processing latency introduced by complex teleoperation pipelines, while the lightweight design enables the high-frequency control required for teleoperation. Simulations across diverse scenarios show that the proposed method achieves a higher end-effector collision avoidance rate than the baseline methods. Experiments on a physical robotic system further validate its collision-avoidance effectiveness.
