Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the integration of regime information into neural networks for forecasting financial volatility, specifically through a novel architecture called RG-ResMoE. By utilizing regime state variables solely for expert routing rather than direct input, the model achieves superior forecasting accuracy and training stability compared to a capacity-matched MLP. The findings highlight that the method of incorporating regime information is crucial, as direct inclusion degrades performance, while strategic routing enhances predictive capabilities and Value-at-Risk calibration.
Regime information can destabilize neural network training, but routing it smartly can significantly boost volatility forecasting accuracy.
Financial volatility is regime dependent, yet incorporating regime information into neural networks can also destabilize training. This paper asks where such information should enter a neural cross-sectional volatility forecasting model. We study five-day realized-volatility forecasts for 1,027 U.S. equities using a rolling walk-forward evaluation framework in which information, model capacity, hyperparameter tuning, and random seeds are matched across architectures. We propose RG-ResMoE, a regime-gated residual mixture-of-experts architecture in which regime information is used only for expert routing rather than for direct forecasting. The base predictor models volatility from stock features, while a gating network uses regime state variables to route residual corrections. RG-ResMoE consistently outperforms a capacity-matched MLP in both forecasting accuracy and training stability in the main U.S. study. Similar gains are observed on an independent Japanese panel. The integration pathway is decisive: appending the same regime variables directly to the forecasting input degrades both predictive performance and training stability, whereas restricting them to the routing gate improves accuracy and Value-at-Risk calibration. Hard routing consistently underperforms soft routing. The results suggest that, in compact neural volatility forecasting models, the primary value of mixture-of-experts models lies less in increasing model capacity than in controlling how nonstationary regime information influences prediction.
